It is so funny when you try to pick all the best possible options happening to Nintendo versus the absolute worse for Series S, then pretend DLSS2.0 will make for like 4 times power difference because it is so much more efficient than what is on the Series S... and while at that make developers decide to use Ray Tracing in the most obtuse way that the game would look current gen with it....
Not to forget you were already claiming Switch to basically be same power as X1 because it run Witcher 3 (well that would also mean it is almost same power as X1X), to jump and say that it would in fact be almost stronger than PS5 solely because of DLSS 2.0 and then complain when not taken serious. We will be waiting for this portable Switch 2 that is more powerful than PS5, putting better looking game from objective terms not those "wii have better looking games than PS3 and X360 because of superior art style" shenanigans.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
