By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JRPGfan on 10 August 2020
Edit Thread
Soundwave said:
JRPGfan said:

AMD had a algothemic shader/contrast sharping thingy, that along with lowering resolution abit, actually gave better performance & looks than DLSS1/Native resoution. So while DLSS is great, there are limits.

DLSS 1, yes, DLSS 2.0 is a different ball game, it kicks the shit out of AMD's solution and I'm guessing DLSS 3.0 will go even further. Reconstructing images maybe from even like SNES resolution? Wouldn't surprise me. 

AMD in general can't stack up to Nvidia. RDNA2 which they are releasing this fall (and the PS5 apparently isn't even RDNA2 proper, it's some kind of cheaped out RDNA 1.5 hybrid, lol) will just be catching up to Nvidia's Turing architecture from 2 years ago. 

That's pretty sad. They're cheap, that's about the best you can say for them. They're out of their element trying to match up with Nvidia here. 

AMD arnt cheap, they are competitively priced with nvidia.
Its just nvidia make really big die, really power hungry and expensive GPUs.
Something AMD refuses to do, they dont even compete for the top end of the market, they let Nvidia make those 1200-1500$ GPUs.

Yes DLSS 2 is better than DLSS, but again, the degree to which, is exagerated by you.
Also the rumor that PS5/XSX are RDNA 1,5 is just that a rumor, which supposedly has been proved wrong. It is RDNA 2, and more than that, it has customisations, that are ahead of its time (ei. PC GPUs with RDNA 3, will first start haveing some of these things).

Why is it like this?
Well because amd do research along with Sony and Xbox on these things (ei. they ask them questions, ask them to do z,y,x, and amd put their minds to it, and develope these things, and lateron they can use some of their findings in new PC GPUs).