| K98632 said: As someone who has lived in the north my entire life, hate the Confederacy, and is married to a black man, I do not support destroying these statues. I feel your summary of being against removing these statues are too simplistic. It isn't about avoiding a very specific type of civil war that you talk about, but rather a display/showcase that good their time can be wrong, and what we can take away from that. In these cases, the ideas of how people can view their fellow humans, and perhaps a self reflection of ones self. I think as a good middle point moving these statues to a more historical site, such as Civil War battlefields, local museums, etc. is a good middle ground that I could get behind. |
Not really clear what you are saying. Are you saying the statues stand as a symbol of a time and its wrongs. The problem with this view is that at no time in no country and definitely not in the US have we ever erect statues and monuments of people that reflect a bad time. We erect statues and monuments to glorify people we respect and honor for what they stand for. If you go to another country, with no knowledge of its history and you see statues and monuments of people, would the first thing come to your mind that this is a display showing what was wrong. I highly doubt it. Instead, if you were interested you would wonder, what did this person do that people wanted to honor that person.
I can agree that they do not all need to be destroyed but they all definitely need to be removed from public places paid for by the taxes of the citizens who live in those states. Since they do have some historical significance as you suggested a historical site would be good for some and for the those mass produced statues they can be auctioned off since they were only erected for a totally different purpose.
