sales2099 said:
That’s a interesting take. Given all the games we will see tomorrow 1st party, the value proposition of GP is staggering. $120-180 (GPU) a year for all you can play, never mind the 3rd party offerings and I could in theory save hundreds a year if you and me were to play the same # of games. To argue against Game Pass is to advocate spending more money with games now being $70 next gen likely. If I play 20 games in 2021 for $180 you would pay $800-1400 to play the same number (assuming many games aren’t full price or smaller titles). Either that or you play less games a year then me to save money. So it’s hard to understand why you wouldn’t want Sony to emulate what is a very consumer friendly service. Genuinely curious as to what your perspective is. |
I think you lost a little bit the focus on the question.
Is about how sony will respond, not how we wish itd respond. As you can read in comments above, sony doesnt feel treatened by GP, as they continue being successful with their bussines model. On the other hand, of course we would like cheaper games, and to spend less money, but that doesnt mean sony will "give us" this, if its doing pretty well as for now.
"We all make choices, but in the end, our choices make us" - Andrew Ryan, Bioshock.