(POSSIBLE SPOILERS INSIDE) The agenda and political discussion of Naughty Dog

[DonFerrari]

Lonely_Dolphin said:

the-pi-guy said:

>so why let them frustrate you?

I'm not frustrated about the game, or anything in the game.  

>Are these people not human?

Why go that far?  They are alive, aren't they?

It's almost like having a head, two arms and two legs isn't enough diversity for people to be satisfied. 

I'm clearly referring to your frustration n disappointment regarding the discussions about the game, I don't see how you could have misunderstood that. Complaining about complainers isn't any less trivial than complaints about the game, to be frank it's completely useless, whereas criticism towards the game could potentially yield a better game.

Why isn't that enough? We are all human and therefore represented. Also why even care? The color of the cast has no bearing on quality, they're also just pixels on a screen.

I feel this whole demand for representation is just as petty as getting upset about games (and everything really) having attractive characters. If one is offended by such characters or the lack of, that's their problem they need to sort out. The creator is free to make his characters as diverse or not as he wants, while the consumer is free to buy it or not.

As much as is petty to demand representation (I don't think it is important and like to watch a lot of thing the protagonist is quite different from me) it is also petty to complain about a game being diverse on cast physical appearance and race/gender/sexual orientation.