Wyrdness said:
- NASA super computers are better tech then what goes into most gaming PCs does that mean they're relevant when talking about dedicated gaming builds no so fact is if it's not in the dedicated gaming space as the context brought up it's not relevant. - 3DS was active up to the end of 2019 (8 years) where the last significant game released for it was Persona Q2 in June this was an increase from DS' 7 years as it had Pokemon B/W2 in in 2012. - Yeah and? You're acting as if the ports wouldn't be late anyway they'd even take longer to do under what you're suggesting, releasing when those games come out makes the task of porting them easier due to being able to use better tech and advancements meaning less compromises in order to get ports to work this is far better then rushing out a platform to try and catch such titles while undermining the success of a very successful platform. The latter is just better for the long term, for example that extra time could be the difference between putting out a device that could be PS4 level or in the middle of it and pro level performance. |
- Please avoid hyperbole. Smartphone tech comparison is not at the same level as the NASA.
- Same can apply to the Switch. It could still be active in 2030 getting some games, but that does not neglect a succesor in 2022 or spring 2023. Wii even got Just Dance this past year and we already had Wii U and Switch.
- Developing the Switch succesor version alongside the other ones could let to more inhouse development and better quality from third parties. It can be easier for developers to add another version than look for an external studio to port an already released game. They can also have a refresh, such as the New 3DS, to address tech improvements.
Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever
Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe
Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor
Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile









