By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kirby007 said:
DonFerrari said:

So you want to defend him without knowing what he ment? And for you how superior is it? Because i have seem you provoking a lot of people and challenging them for more precision, names, data, source, etc, but at the same time you just try to avoid doing it yourself. Basically only looking to steer problem.

even if he means it the way you guys percieve it doesn't mean there are other ways to view it... thats all i wanted to add here.

Ok. Problem is for a good communication when someone interpose the "it is vastly superior" with "it isn't", if someone would recognize as superior but not by the same margin he would likely include more information, when kept shortly like that the most likely probability is that he doesn't think the library is superior at all. And we know that there are several people that think that, some for personal taste (totally valid) and some really believes that as market reality (which would be wrong looking from reception, sales, customer rating, etc).

But if you just wanted to say that someone may say something and not mean it even if you don't know what he meant ok then.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."