(POSSIBLE SPOILERS INSIDE) The agenda and political discussion of Naughty Dog

[DonFerrari]

jardesonbarbosa said:
I don't agree with that. They just were never that good to begin with in terms of storytelling. I actually don't understand how people can say Uncharted 1-3 are perfect, but 4 sucks, and worst of all, citing Nadine as one of the problems. Because she beats up pretty boy Nathan? That's the biggest problem with that game? That's BS. That whole game is a trainwreck. I think people only started picking flaws on ND games because the games introduced things those people don't want to see (like minorities). Let's be honest, Uncharted 2 was not that good. The story was stupid and the game itself, while polished, was a basic third person cover/shooter, the only reason people are complaing now, is because the games are not pandering to them anymore.

Please see the recomendation to talk ND games not things tangent to it.

EnricoPallazzo said:

DonFerrari said:

Considering the game have 7k reviews on PSN with average 4,5/5 versus 50k reviews on metacritic with average 3,9/10 I would say it is mostly column A.

Not saying that it explains the difference because it does not, but around 3k reviews were already made to the game giving it a 5 prior to release, because it seems you can review the game as soon as you start the pre-download. I may be wrong though.

And how would you compare to 40k reviews being with majority being 0 on metacritic put less than a day after the release of the game?