By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NightlyPoe said:
RolStoppable said:

That's easy to say for men.

Trying to negate an opinion based on a person's inherited traits instead of engaging the argument...

Generally frowned upon in most situations.

Immersiveunreality said:

I think it very much should exist everywhere,sometimes it is even selfless to end anothers beginning of living to avoid suffering.

Institutions are full with children of prolife parents that got sick of them afterwards,lonely and suffering till the end.

So we're back to the original idea that orphans are better off dead?

Yeah, I just reject that.

Immersiveunreality said:

Bolded:But what does life being human matter,he has the right to suffer and die after being born instead of being aborted?

Yes, a person has the right to a potentially lousy (and potentially wonderful) life instead of being aborted.

First bold: But you are trying to force your own generalising will unto possible suffering children and females that you neglect because you think all life must live.

Second bold:Orphans are not better of dead,SOME are better of dead but your extremity is pushing them all under the same thought.

Third bold:Sometimes the chance is low or nonexistent to have a wonderfull life,medical equipment exists to be able to see some things very early on.