By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
gergroy said:
DonFerrari said:

Well VIII isn't similar case? I know that I can ignore IX on this because I love it since PS1. But VIII was the enhanced port similar to VII right? And I still liked it more than VII. But sure I not liking the original VII makes me not be annoyed by the changes of the remake.

8 was quite a bite more enhanced then 7.  On 7 they just enhanced the resolution a tad, where the 8 and 9 ports actually had redone character models and such.  Also, it’s graphics in general aged a bit better anyway.  7 was basically LEGO characters, where 8 and 9 did a better job of having actual characters.

The first time I played 9 I thought graphics couldn't get better and even today without the improvements I still find it pretty while 7 even on the enhanced I can't stop thinking it is ugly. And perhaps I played to little (stopped after leaving Midgard) so maybe the story up until that moment wasn't as good and the level up system wasn't much of my liking as well.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."