| src said: The sales segment is pointless imo. Nintendo provides quarter by quarter sales info on all their software. MS has stopped giving numbers eversince XB1 massively declined. Sony only gives numbers whenever they feel like. |
Sony also gives updates to most of their noteworthy releases. Sure it isn't as often and transparent as Nintendo. But even like that Nintendo is a little troubling to look for data. Their wiki for what are the studios and them their releases per studio is less organized than Sony and MS, plus on the sales most of the not blockbuster on google only showed the percentage of shipment sold in japan on first week but not total sales. So to update their numbers I would probably need to go to all their financial data scooping for info =[. But yes MS is even harder to get proper data, the best we can get is their comments on number of users due to GP. Also not to forget that we are basically comparing MS and Sony 1 system against Nintendo 3 system mostly.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







