By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
DonFerrari said:

It would be to unfavorable to use WiiU for Nintendo instead of Switch, it had less games, less sales and lower critical reception.

It doesn't matter if it's unfavorable when it is the correct thing to do. Nintendo lost in a big way in the home console market of the eighth generation. If someone made a breakdown of the handheld market of the eighth generation, it would be equally silly to leave out the Vita for the reason that it looks unfavorable for Sony.

Then we either would have 2 systems from Nintendo or we would end on Switch being 8th gen or 9th which have 0 agreement.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."