By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SpokenTruth said:
Immersiveunreality said:

Still debatable in federal court,published material for marketing or not and i'm not talking about this particular scenario but the bolded generalization you made in the previous comment .

But my statement wasn't a generalization.  It was specifically about marketing materials.

"Any photos or videos published for marketing purposes falls under Fair Use for they are published materials."


How in the world is that a generalization and not a specific reference to published marketing materials?

I'm pretty sure he was talking about unreleased material.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."