By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ka-pi96 said:
DonFerrari said:

Even if it was a single person money they have the right to their property and others trying to use it for themselves are of lesser priority.

People have a right to talk about their property. Journalists have a right to write articles about their property (and use images/videos in those articles).

Sony are just being dicks and abusing a broken system (Twitter's DMCA system) in order to prevent people from doing things they have a legal right to do.

Sure people have the right to talk. But several of those aren't journalists.

And yes Sony is being a dick, but much less than the leakers and several of the people that covered it.

Ka-pi96 said:
Immersiveunreality said:

They have the right to reveal that information themselves in the form that does the product justice.

You mean after they've extracted money from people?

Not really, no. People have a right to know what they're buying before they buy it.

The review embargo ends 1 week before the release of the game, so plenty of time to cover it. And the leaks don't review the game.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."