By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JEMC said:

I have no complains about the Navi lineup. It covered everything from the 570XT to the 5300XT parts. Anything lower than that and you're not getting a GPU for gaming, but rather a video output... and you'd almost be better served with an APU.

But I swear to God, if AMD's RX 6000 range features any GCN parts, I'm going to lose it. There will be no expuses for that other than laziness and being cheap.

Oh, and I wouldn't put too much faith in that Navi 23 part. It has the same specs as the part inside the Xbox Series X and that could be the internal name for it or something like that. It doesn't have to be a GPU that will become a retail card, tho I wouldn't mind it.

I thought the XSX was Navi 22?

In any case, there's a huge gap otherwise between Navi 10 and 21, and something needs to fill it up at least a little bit. Could be another part of course, but something would need to fill that void.

As for Baffin in a RX 6000 lineup, I wouldn't mind really. That's more on OEMs requiring something between Lexa and Navi 14 - but that's more for third world countries where that is considered good enough for e-sports titles, but too small a market on it's own to be worth creating a new chip for. I did never see those entry-level cards in the wild otherwise. And yes, APUs will fill that gap, but again not in less developed countries where everybody saves on RAM as much as possible to keep costs low, which cripples the APUs of course.