sethnintendo said: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/05/tara-reade-loses-attorney-joe-biden-allegation.html |
I don't get it... It literally says in the article:
"Wigdor said in a statement that the decision is 'by no means a reflection on whether then-Senator Biden sexually assaulted Ms. Reade.'"
So that article doesn't mean anything. It could or could not have happened. The only determinate now is just a personal one, whether you believe one "liar" over another.
It's funny how the same people that basically said that you shouldn't rush to conclusions and believe anyone until it's sorted out in court are now the ones rushing to conclusions...
Last edited by tsogud - on 24 May 2020