Lonely_Dolphin on 19 May 2020
| Vodacixi said: I think we should wait until we have more information on the battle system before we judge it. Btw, it doesn't need to be like the old Paper Mario to be good. Reading some of your comments gives the idea that they either go back to what they did with the first two games or it's going to be trash. That's not how it works. Intelligent Systems only has to make sure that one: the battles have a purpouse; and two: that the battles are fun. How they do it's irrelevant as long as they achieve those goals. |
Opinions can and will change when new facts are learned, so there's no need to tell people not to have a negative opinion especially while you're not doing the same for positive ones.
Now I think it does need to be a Paper Mario game if it wants to use the name. There's already at least one post in this thread of someone saying they're interested in this game after playing the originals. Even I was fooled by Sticker Star, so I bet there's plenty more who will fall for this deception.
