Pemalite said:
Hynad said:
The PS5 solution isn't a multi SSD setup, unlike the one you speak of. So I continue to question why you hardly ever give props to console makers/hardware when compared to PC.
|
SSD's by their very design utilize a group of smaller drives/memory chips. Memory transactions are parallel in nature.
This just takes it one step further... And proves that the PC still has the absolute edge in terms of SSD performance over consoles, if you are willing to pay for it that is.
And I have praised the Xbox Series X and Playstation 5's SSD's on multiple occasions on this forum.
I have praised both consoles on their solid hardware choices, that they are both solid pieces of hardware kit, perhaps you have only chosen to read what you wanted to read?
It's also no secret that I am a PC gamer first and foremost and I have absolutely no bias towards any console platform as at the end of the day, they are all just PC's anyway.
black8jac said:
Well, every PS5 has this insanely fast SSD. What percentage of PC gamers have multi SSDs in raid?
|
Who knows? And not the point I was making.
black8jac said:
Yeah top end PCs will catch up pretty quickly, but in order to be considered by developers as min requirement it has to be mainstream. Long wait, mate.
|
Top-end PC's already beat the Playstation 5 and Xbox Series X... And the Playstation 5 and Xbox Series X hasn't even released onto the market yet.
|
Despite You ignoring it, my point still stands. There is fraction of the fraction of one percent PC users who has multi SSDs in RAID0, what makes them irrelevant. Mainstream is what matters. There is one more thing. PS5 is equipped with controller with 12 Direct Memory Access channels, not to mention hardware compression/decompression, coherency management etc. All that together makes it a top solution at the moment. Not only transfer speeds.
