By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Oneeee-Chan!!! said:

Correct and I don't understand Chinese but there are people on Resetera that can and they confirmed what the reddit post is saying is correct.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/tim-sweeney-on-ue5-the-nanite-and-lumen-tech-powering-it-will-be-fully-supported-on-both-ps5-and-xbox-series-x-and-will-be-awesome-on-both.206223/page-10#post-34177323

I think the ps5's GPU and CPU will perform worse than the highest end laptop PCs while the SSD on PS5 will be leagues faster. But the PS5 will age better than what's on the market as of now in the long run.

Wait a minute.
Why is the PS5 GPU performing less than the mobile RTX 2080?
RDNA2's performance should be greater than RDNA1.
At least above the 5700XT and should be equivalent to the RTX2080.
In addition, the performance efficiency is different in pc and the console.
Even in the same part the console has much better performance.

You just quote someone else,can you really explain it?

Well a 2080 is faster than a 5700 XT and yea RDNA2 will be faster than RDNA1.

5700 XT = 40 CU. PS5 = 36 CU but PS5 will be faster with less CU than 5700 XT with more CU.

But a 2080 is a good amount faster than 5700 XT. You would need the Series X to match/beat that performance in GPU. But we won't know for sure until we see more games/engines.

And the person I linked is just verifying what reddit said is correct.



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850