By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
eva01beserk said:
Kristof81 said:

Well UE5 was way more impressive, however, it's a tech demo. UE4 tech demos also looked very impressive (7 years ago), and not many games achieved this level of fidelity since then. Remember PS3 tech demos? Also, the UE5 is not going to be available until next year. MS, on the other hand, showed actual games, so of course it's less impressive, but more important.

Unreal Engine 4 tech demo (2013)

Unreal Engine 3 tech demo (2011)

PS3 tech demo (2005)

Maybe ask digital foundry as they claim the opposite. They say devs flew over and beyond what the tech demo showed. 

Well we are on a time where official information, open comments and props for the system aren't credible, but unreliable rumors are credible.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."