JWeinCom said:
The XSX didn't due much for me either in that regard because they were multiplatform games. Same principle applies. Unless either side is showing something that is exclusive or at least is somehow better on their system, I don't see why it would sway my decision. But I think there may have been a couple of exclusives on there (Scarlett whatever might be I think?) so I guess maybe they get points for that. I can see why people may be more hyped for the next generation in general based on the presentation. But anyone who is claiming that either of those presentations really made a difference probably had already made up their minds anyway. |
Yes I agree with you in all aspects. The main problem on the MS presentation wasn't that most were multiplats, but that they were mostly underwhelming.
The point of the thread was just to contrast that the GDC video was met with "Sony is doomed", "they are losing mindshare", "their marketing is poor", etc. But so far, the logo reveal, the control reveal, the GDC video and this one have all been met with much more reaction and attention to PS5 than anything MS was able to do.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."