By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ljink96 on 07 May 2020
Edit Thread
RolStoppable said:
Ljink96 said:

Welp, at least the word think is used. We're all entitled to our opinions. The reason you play Mario Party isn't the reason everyone plays it. If you feel other games had "unappealing boards" that's fine, but everyone doesn't think that. The variety and complexity of boards has always been what entices me to Mario Party. And compared to say the Gamecube games, the boards are very flat, So not only is it lacking in game modes and boards, but the boards that are there are mostly flat and uninspired. Minigames should supplement the boards. All I know is I've played past Mario Parties way more than I did Super, simply because of the variety of game modes like 5 had, simply isn't there. 

*checks database on Ljink96*

I see, you are the person who is convinced that Super Mario 3D Land was a much more enticing game and had more replay value than Super Mario 3D World.

Hm... wouldn't the logic that not everybody plays a game for the same reason apply to you as well? Maybe you are the minority when it comes to Mario Party.

Okay...you're kinda strange. lol

Yes, I do think 3D Land is better than 3D World. It's a better designed platformer seeing as it was designed for 1 player rather than 4. There's a reason why 4 player 3D Platformers aren't often attemped and 3D World shows it. The flow of the levels is just nowhere near as tight as 3D Land's because of the emphasis on so much space. If we want to bring sales into it we could go there as well, but that won't end too well for you in terms of being in the minority. And conversely it doesn't end to well sales wise for me for Super Mario Party vs. say, like 5-8. 

And yes, everyone does play games for different reasons. I never implied that it doesn't... if you disagree like I said, that's fine... I just don't use words like "plain wrong" when having a discussion. But like I said, think is a great word. As long as you can explain why you disagree that's great, using absolute language doesn't invite discussion.