By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Rafie said:
I owned and STILL own both consoles. In pristine condition I might add. Anyway, I'm a bit bias here. I absolutely adored my Dreamcast back then. Over my PS2, Xbox, etc. I still have 22 games for it. Pretty much all of the fighters and beat'em ups, Sonic 2, Crazy Taxi, House of the Dead, etc.

My OG Xbox is loved more than the PS2 as well. I thought it was technology the best thing out then. Maybe because it was. I have all the games for that system as well. All of the popular titles. I very much disliked the controller though.

Anyway, I'm picking Dreamcast solely for those incredible games that released. I agree with some saying that we will probably never see an influx of titles the way Dreamcast did it. Capcom seemed to have heavily invested in Dreamcast. I have damn near all of their titles on it. Moving on, my family & friends and I gamed on it constantly. Loved the VMU and such. It was ahead of it's time back then. Xbox was nothing to scoff at either. I was just more impressed with the Dreamcast because nothing was like it in the market at that time.

That is because even if one hardware is better or have more features what you are going to remember is what you played on it.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."