By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Immersiveunreality said:
JWeinCom said:

But what is an apologist?  Shouldn't people apologize more often?  Isn't it good for a person to apologize to another when they have done something wrong?  Do you attack everyone who says they are sorry for something?

What is a tactic?  Is a tactic just a type of strategy?  When a general develops a strategy shouldn't others be able to see it?  

And what is wrong with defending?  Is it wrong for a man to defend his home?  Would you criticize a cornerback when he defends a pass?  Wouldn't the world be a terrible place if nobody defended anything? Doesn't everyone defend something?

All in context is wrong or right,the questions you ask can go all ways depending on the motivation behind the apology and the knowledge and intelligence of the apologist.

But i'm not gonna be an apologist(wink) for either of the teams in here because i'm tired of that eternal back and forth.

That just sounds stupid to me.

Context cant be wrong, else its not really context.
A questions answear, cannot just go "all ways" when the then one in question, was basically a yes/no type of thing.

"cant we just inject people with disinfectants? I hear that stuff can kill the virus in a minuet"

Answear = no, we cant president.


"for either teams"?
What kinda stupid is that too.
Theres a right and wrong, in this, and it has nothing to do with "teams" or sides of the political fence your on.
"truth" cannot be a matter of politics.

The issue is no one is willing to say so to trump.

Trump does or says crazy things, if he gets backlash from it on news channels (main fox news, cuz others are "fake news"), he'll backtrack or claim hes misunderstood or never said such things (even if theres video of him doing or saying such).

Last edited by JRPGfan - on 26 April 2020