By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
src said:
StarDoor said:

You're completely missing the point. This has nothing to do with how inaccurate Superdata is. Your blatantly false data and incoherent narrative are the problems.

https://investor.activision.com/news-releases/news-release-details/call-duty-modern-warfare-delivers-blockbuster-opening-weekend

"SANTA MONICA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 30, 2019-- Activision’s Call of Duty®: Modern Warfare® had more than $600 million in sell-through worldwide in its first three days of release."

$600 million worldwide. An approximate 10 million units worldwide. Not just the US.

And you should really check your math. To get 5 million in digital sales with a 40% digital rate, you'd have to have total sales of 12.5 million. Not 7.5 million.

AC sold 2.6 million physically in Japan. In the US, it sold enough physical copies in March to become the best-selling game in the franchise, so that's another 2.3 million at minimum. Add in the rest of the world, in which AC usually sells substantially more than it does in the US, and we're already above 7.5 million physical. With just a 25% digital rate, its worldwide sell-through exceeds 10 million in March.

You can be in denial all you want. It doesn't change the fact that New Horizons had a launch month that rivals Modern Warfare.

Superdata at least has a slim chance of being right. You don't.

Ahh yes I did a math error. Should be 3 million US digital alone. Still more than enough to handily beat AC WW.Not sure why you reiterate worldwide for revenue, that's known.

AC did less than 2 million physical in the US. This does not come close to COD 6-9 million US launches even with a 50% digital ratio.

Funny how you completely ignore how inaccurate Superdata's digital tracking was with DBZ but makes sense.

Like I said, confirmation bias.

In US, there is a chance for COD. But in Asia and Japan, AC blows COD out of water like nothing, so your point???