John2290 said:
Maybe but the much smarter and safer option is yo wait until we can teat so much that tracking clusters will be near full proof and containment can be kept up. If they get the data, the testing and matched with our current computing tech outbreaks should never exceed a local community. I don't think any western country is in a position to gamble on Herd immunity without guaranteed tracking or this massive economical fuck up would have been for nothing. What I'm saying is, expect the governments to play it as safe as possible in countries that aren't living hand to mouth, day to day. I think tagging and tracking along with prolonged and total isolation of the vulnerable until a vaccine is the plan most governemnts will fall to as long as they still have the credit to do so. |
Getting multiple bigger waves of the virus with spaced out prolonged lockdowns might be the way to go. The state has to take money from somewhere and it won't be able to do that if it doesn't get some money. People won't get money without providing it, that's what economy is all about.
Stretched out sporadic slumps might be better to handle than one single complete collapse. Like taking a loan. Sure, you pay overall more due to interest, but it's better than having to pay everything upfront. Humans aren't min-maxable.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.