SpokenTruth said:
DélioPT said:
A company that is only supporting a single console acts the same way it did when it was supporting 2 consoles: the lack of proper 1st party games for a time period of what.. 6 months?... is not really understandable.
Focusing on a single console should have this covered so it wouldn't happen again. Yet, it did.
And we still have yet to see what's coming next, since Nintendo's best (selling) IPs are all out or pretty much.
3rd parties insisting on bringing ports and more ports only shows how they see Switch as na easy buck.
But they do this because people keep liking this strategy. So, why should they stop, right?
Overall, passable ND.
What worries is that, 3 years after being released and still no signs of Nintendo and 3rd parties changing their ways. Specially Nintendo - who is supposed to carry the console by itself, anyway. |
I know. It's almost like there was a worldwide event disrupting economies, business, product distribution, markets, etc....
Good thing it's just Nintendo fucking up and I can't wait to attend E3 again this year.
|
That's not an explanation for Nintendo's (bad) strategy.
3 years into the console and things should have been different and they are not.
