Vodacixi said:
So... Digital Foundry knows better than the actual creators of the game... what their game is? Wow, that's... something, I guess. You and many people (including Digital Foundry) are using wrong words to reffer to a remaster. That's pretty much what's going on here. It's understandable, because people see fancy graphics and inmmediatly think "remake". But that's not how it works. I explained to you countless of times. You haven't been able to counter any of my statements. You just keep saying "you are wrong" like parrot without doing any significant contribution to your point of view. You have NOTHING on this. So, stop wasting everyone's time and learn to talk properly already. Jesus... |
He has already answered you. It's a marketing move. Crash fans would have badly overreacted if the game was called Crash Bandicoot Trilogy Remake, because "Oh no they're ruining my favourite game!". By calling it a remaster people would have understood that the game was not ruining the original one. But this is something that has already been written, you have basically just ignored it and prentended he has no arguments. Let's talk about Panzer Dragoon Remake: it should be easy for you to look on youtube and see original game walkthrough/gameplay, then look at the "remake" footage, developer called it a Remake but it's clearly not. Now let me say something: FFVII is a Remake but in a different way than Xenoblade Chronicles Defintive Edition is or Crash Bandicoot N.Sane Trilogy, Crash Team Racing Nitro Fueled or Spyro Reignited Trilogy. I'd like to call those game as "1:1 Remake" to separate remakes like FFVII Remake or RE2/RE3 Remake from those remakes that are made from scratch but they're basically the same as the original ones
Zanark best Inazuma Eleven pg
