By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 26 March 2020
Edit Thread
routsounmanman said:
Hynad said:

They take an example out of Nintendo’s playbook.

Mario Kart 8 Deluxe is still going at full price, despite it being an updated port of a Wii U game.

That’s just one of the many examples.

Are you actually comparing Nintendo and Capcom on their Switch offerings? Nintendo has some blunders (MK8D not being one of them, the main culprit for me is DKTF), but they actually carry a 50m+ system on their own via amazing NEW games, as well as ports and remasters. Meanwhile, Capcom has done NOTHING on Switch, and use it only as a means to fund Xbox / PC / PS games. What happens when that well dries up, though, eh?

What obligation does Capcom have to support Switch? And why that should excuse Nintendo doing practices condemned when others do?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."