By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
HollyGamer said:

Well they are crap to "some" Nintendo fans. But not all call them crap, some of them grateful.

Capcom have been generous by porting a lot of games to Switch. Of course it's a matter of opinion and tastes. Because who don't like playing old relics on portable isn't that's the purpose of Switch.   

No, the purpose of the Switch is not to play old relics portably.

Several publishers have put current games on Switch, from Doom 2016 and Wolfenstein II/Youngblood to Mortal Kombat 11, from Hellblade to Witcher 3. There's no reason RE7 or a new Monster Hunter couldn't be brought to Switch, Crapcom are just too lazy.

Really sick of the lazy argument. Making ports of that caliber takes a lot of ressources that studios may or may not feel is justified or viable, for various reasons. Laziness is almost never a part of the equation.

And let’s not forget that more often than not, the port job isn’t done in-house. Doom, for example, was ported by Panic Button. So, if anything you should express how lazy id Software was for not doing the job themselves.