By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hiku said:
HollyGamer said:

Well they are crap to "some" Nintendo fans. But not all call them crap, some of them grateful.

Capcom have been generous by porting a lot of games to Switch. Of course it's a matter of opinion and tastes. Because who don't like playing old relics on portable isn't that's the purpose of Switch.   

Don't know if I'd call porting DMC 1, 2 and 3 as separate games as generous, when there's been an HD collection on other systems for years.
And the price of the HD collection is less than it costs to buy one of those singular games on Switch.

But the Switch version of DMC3 has new meaningful content, and they have ported a good number of quality (but older) games that people like so they've done good in that department as well.

Well they are being generous to their bank account =p



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."