By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JRPGfan said:
Chicho said:

whats the point of releasing a weaker console than the Xbox one X for a higher price. Lockhart has to be at leat a bit more powerfull than xbox one X

the 4+ Tflops of a RDNA 2, is probably abit better than the XBox One X's 6 Tflops, in terms of actual performance.


Think of it like this:

AMD radeon VII (13,4 Tflops) (gcn) is actually abit slower than a 5700 XT (9,74 Tflops)

~27% less Tflops, same or more performance on the RDNA1 card.

RDNA 2 (supposedly) makes another jump like that.
So you could well see 4Tflops of the Lockhart, be as fast as the xbox one X.

Then you factor in the SSD, Faster Ram, Beefy CPU the lockhard has.... Xbox One X is gonna likely run games worse than Lockhart.

*edit:

Right now Xbox One X is selling for 499$.
Soon it ll probably be 300$ or under (for a new model) (until they clear stocks).

Also certainly on the new process, without vapor chamber and other details Series S will be much cheaper to produce than Scorpio would ever be.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."