| FloatingWaffles said: I don't even understand what your point is with this. Yes, just because something can be successful without something doesn't mean they shouldn't still strive to offer it if possible? I'm not saying it will be a dominating factor by any means as to whether something is successful. If you wanna argue against whether the amount of work it would take to get full BC is worth it for the amount of people who would use it versus focusing on what you know most will use, then that's a different conversation altogether. Plus, I always knew that PS1-PS2-PS3 BC was a pipe dream, i'm not annoyed that I didn't get what I wanted, moreso it's towards Sony's stance on it that it's not even worth looking into and that nobody cares about it. And to your last question you're basically asking me "Why would you want to play 4 generations of amazing games all on one single system?". |
Why should I buy a new system to play archaic games, though?
Personally, I have no interest in things that were released before 2010. Most good games got remastered on PS4 anyway (still not interested).
