JRPGfan said:
10,3 vs 12,15 However the GPU parts of the Playstation 5, run at higher speeds. Ram 520 GB/s vs 448 GB/s = ~14% However I dont think it ll matter, both will run 4k games. |
Should have said under 20%. But yes on the direct math it is 15% lower, but that may shrunk more due to higher frequency and also the colaboration of the faster SSD. Still same ballpark, and for me a good trade-off on cost versus performance when they can have so many CUs less but still deliver within 15% performance.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







