By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KiigelHeart said:
Nautilus said:

Im just saying that this is being way overblown.Common diseases like the common cold is more deadly than this disease, and Corona is far more dangerous to the elderly and young kids than other people(Which I think make up for most of the dead I believe), which E3 could prohibit those categories of people from entering, not the others.

Again, I get it, just feels like an exageration.

Elderly, young kids and people with certain health issues. And even if those people were prohibited from entering, events like E3 might still spread the virus. And it's a risk for everyone.

Health should be a priority,  not some gaming, sports or music events. It sucks but it is what it is.

Just like the flu is spread through contact too?Or Tuberculosis?Or any other common disease that have killed far more than it?

Again, I get it, just think this is an overreaction.I mean, there are still events going on here and there, PAX East being one I can remember on the top of my head, but I don't remember seeing the number of infected people increase drastically after the event happened.

I guess since I am more of a exact science kind of person, I base more my decision on numbers and facts.Personally, the chance of you getting infected going into places like that(assuming you are not in China, of course) is so minimal that I personally wouldn't worry.But that's me.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1