By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NightlyPoe said:
HylianSwordsman said:

You think winning progressive Christians, all non-white groups, and all white non-Christian groups is a coalition based on "prejudice, tribalism, and hate"? It's the polar opposite. You're projecting.

All coalitions based on identity are based on prejudice, tribalism, and hate in the end.  Ones that are based on minorities are no more virtuous.

You think because you are in the tribe that you are virtuous, but you make the same sad mistake of stratifying a society as so many in the past and have not learned from those mistakes.

It's not "based" on identity, it's just a coalition that you can measure off of such support. It will also have the support of unions, working class people, suburban and urban populations. However you want to word it. Me listing off the "identities" as you call them is just showing the breadth and depth of the coalition, not establishing a basis for it. They're demographic labels, not "identities" and the fact that you call them that shows us that YOU'RE the identity politician, not the Democrats.