By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
Amnesia said:

I am not sure Nintendo has to justify themself about adjusting stock or not. If UK was severly under supplied, I would expect other country to be just fine without too much stock overall. I had a different theory not mentioned here :

If they had announced 20 or 20.5, what would have been then the FY2021 forecast ?...This would have not allowed them a lot of margin, they would have announced more ?... Or a bit less ? admitting that FY2021 would be the decline year of the Switch ? Starting from 19,5M, they can then announce a safe 20M to show that they still forecast progression for the switch. Capitalism is just about "always more, more and MORE..."

Once Nintendo announces a weaker forecast on year N compared to year N-1, the stock could collapse quickly.

Your theory is 100% nonsensical and here's why:

It doesn't matter what Nintendo forecasts because hardware shipments will ultimately judged by actual performance. For example, if Switch managed 20.5m this fiscal year, it wouldn't matter at all if Nintendo forecasted 19.5m, 20.0m or 20.5m, because the actual performance of 20.5m would be the measuring stick going forward in any case.

Secondly, what the stock market is really looking at is the bottom line of a company, so it's about expected profits/losses. Even a company that makes a loss of $1 billion can see their stock rise when their forecast was a loss of $1.5 billion, because they performed above expectations. Now as an example, if Nintendo finished this fiscal year with 19.5m and then forecasted 19.0m for the following fiscal year, that's not necessary going to hurt the stock; because what is important is their profit forecast and that might very well be higher despite lower hardware shipments. That's because software is more profitable and software sales continue to grow even when the hardware has already reached a plateau. In short, you are too obsessed with hardware shipments when it comes to stock price.

hmm. Ok. And by the way, what would be your explanation for that (I have fucking no clue) :