That seems like an enormous amount of work done there. Thanks for doing it all.
On a similar note, how about limiting ourselves to games with (let's say) 5 votes or more. On maybe something like 5 total votes, or 3 placements in a top 10 position. I mean, is it really a "greatest game" because one person ranked it number 47 on their list? And, 1130? That seems like about 1000 more games than necessary. With 130 games, it would still be a massive list, and include some strange titles that would lead to much discussion about whether they deserve to be there.
Anyway, I'm not trying to tell anyone what to do, or take anything away from the huge accomplishment by Mzuzek of putting this whole thing together. I'm just saying, it seems like it would be a little easier on both the administrator and the participants in this thread, with little to no loss in value, if it was cut to a more reasonable number.