SpokenTruth said:
You....you...do understand that was in retaliation, right? As in an attack that would not have happened had we not killed their general. And you can't read very well either. I said, "It also appears you're not aware of one of Iran's most deadly capabilities....cyber attacks." Where in that statement is specifically stated that Iran will only retaliate with cyber attacks? |
That specific attack was retaliation yes, obviously. But what I have been trying to tell you is that had that general not been murdered, people would STILL die, attacks would STILL happen, Iran and Israel would STILL hate each other, the US would STILL consider Iran an enemy and vice versa.
Why can't you understand this?







