By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
z101 said:
SwitchUP said:
When digital foundry makes a judgement of games between systems, as long as it jives with what some think, it's ok, if not, they're wrong? They said, the image quality on the switch version looks straight up better than the ps4 version, with caveats. Less or nonexistent ambient occlusion... it otherwise retains everything in the game, aside from the terrible aliasing.... which is what made them say, aside from the small sacrifices, the game has a better overall image quality. No big deal. It's the first time, and most likely, the last. The switch got a small"win"... yay. I'm loving the game. First time for me. It's great. The fact it's the best place to play it? Perfect.

There are already many ports on Switch that had comparable image quality to PS4 or only slightly worse. 

Thats not suprising, because the better the graphics, the less quality you can achieve with more power. Diminishing returns. Thats why Microsoft and Sony both starts with relatively expensive consoles in 2020, otherwise the graphical advantages of the next gen would be almost invisible.

Errrr a game that have comparable IQ to PS4 have nothing to do with diminishing returns.

Switch won't receive any game that have IQ close to SpiderMan, GoW, TLOU2, Ghost of Tsushima, HZD, etc.

The games where the graphic is similar were because that weren't the main focus. But yes this isn't the only game that IQ is close enough to be said that differences aren't of much relevance.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."