| goopy20 said: Look, minimum or recommended requirements, it makes no difference. |
Look, you have been proven wrong over and over again in this thread. Suddenly it makes no difference, if we are talking about minimum or recommended requirements? Looks a bit like "shifting the goal post".
May I remind you to your former opinion? "People here make it sound like the minimum pc requirements are some kind of vague concept that's open to interpretation, but it's literally what's written on the back of a box when you buy a pc game."
| goopy20 said: At this time there is no multiplatform game out there that recommends a RTX 2xxx and next year there will be. If people want to play those games in 720p without ray tracing and the lowest settings, then yes you're probably not going to need that. |
There is a lot of room between 4K and 720p, for example 1440p, 1080p, dynamic resolutions. There is a lot of room between ultra/epic settings and lowest settings for example very high, high, medium. There are several precision options for raytracing resulting in different additional demands to the GPU. More and more PC gamers already have G-Sync or Freesync monitors, so the fps doesn't have to be locked to 60 fps or 120 fps.
It is far from being as black and white as you are trying to picture it.
| goopy20 said: But for any self respecting pc gamer that wants to experience the big AAA titles in all of its full ray tracing glory, as god and the developers intended those games to be played, you WILL need to upgrade if you currently gaming on a mainstream gaming pc. |
Nice try to put all PC gamers with different standards and preferences into one drawer.
