Rumor:PS5 & Anaconda Scarlet GPU on par with RTX 2080, Xbox exclusives focus on Cross gen, Developer complain about Lockhart.UPDATE: Windows Central said Xbox Anaconda target 12 teraflop

[Bofferbrauer2]

Pemalite said:

HollyGamer said:
12 teraflop confirmed, LOL. in GCN number Navi teraflop are equal to 1,4 times of GCN performance 12X 1.4 = 16.8 teraflop of GCN from Xbox One = 16.8/1.3= 12.9 times more powerful than Xbox One.

Flops is not everything when it comes final look of games, but it's there to measure theoretically . So it's a humongous improvement.

So we still need to confirmed PS5 performance before we close this nthread.

False.
Otherwise the Radeon RX5500 XT with it's 8.6-10.1 Teraflops of power would have been able to decisively beat the Radeon RX 590 with it's 6.7-7.1 Teraflops of power.

Plus you are asserting that Navi's Teraflops are 1.4x better than GCN's meaning the RX 5500 should be the equivalent of 9.38-9.94 Teraflops of the Radeon RX 590, which should see the Radeon RX 5500 XT with a significant performance advantage over the RX 590 and we know THAT didn't happen.

https://www.anandtech.com/show/15206/the-amd-radeon-rx-5500-xt-review

This is why using your flops metrics is an absolute joke, it's absolutely useless.

You are aware that you are comparing half precision to single precision in that example, right? RX 5500XT has 4.7-5.2 Teraflops in single precision, significantly less than an RX 590 yet almost at the same performance. RX 5700 beats RX Vega despite having less TFlops. Which also shows that teraflops can only be compared within same architecture (and even then, with limitations) and can't be used otherwise as a yardstick.

I agree with the rest of what you're saying, just wanted to point out that inconsistency there.