Pokemon Sword/Shield Official Metacritic Score/Review Thread. (80)

[Runa216]

Lonely_Dolphin said:

JWeinCom said:

Right, your other go to move.  When you can't actually address the argument, simply assert the motivations of the opposing party in an attempt to discredit them.

https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/1/Ad_Hominem_Abusive

lol says the guy desperately trying to distract from the argument.

Runa216 said:

Honestly, I don't even know where to start with this. You genuinely seem to either purposely misrepresent what people say in order to sound like you're right (this is a strawman fallacy) or you genuinely outright don't have the attention span to read till the end of the post. 

Until you learn to actually engage with others in a respectful and intelligent way, I see no reason to continue responding to you. Your response to my post and others is remarkably off base, responding to points we didn't make and making accusations that have absolutely no basis in the truth of our characters. We are not the ones being irrational, here; you are. 

It's funny you talk about purposeful misrepresentation when that's how the guy you're coming to defend started this whole conversation. It's funny you talk about strawman when trying to change the subject to be about my argumentative style itself is a strawman, certainly has nothing to do with any of the discussion points being chrkeller complaining about complainers, generalizing, and lying.

There is basis in my accusation, your post here is further evidence of you making claims with no proof or explanation, only excuses why you wont provide them, and despite this you waffle on as if you're in the right. But yeah, with your logic of Game Freak being entitled to our money, that standards actually work in reverse and we should be happy with inferior games, I know I shouldn't waste my time on you, but it's just so fun pointing out your nonsense.

MasonADC said:

But what if the game has been balanced around it? That doesn’t need a fundamental change to the exp share, and if that is the case, then it is better 

There was no proof or explanation on how the game has been better balanced around it, and regardless there's no reason for it to not be optional.

Have you not been paying any attention? The unanimous consensus among everyone in this thread aside from you is that you're the one being disingenuous here. Give it up, man.