Lonely_Dolphin said:
JWeinCom said:
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/169/Strawman-Fallacy
This seems to be just your go to thing. The simple fact is he did not say he didn't attack people. He said nope indicating that he was disagreeing with some part of your post. Since the word nope absent of context is vague and unclear, he then provided two more specific statements precisely defining his disagreement. His clarification made it clear that "nope" was not implying that he never attacked people for any reason.
But hey, responding to what you wanted him to say is much easier than responding to what was actually said. Of course, I'm probably just nitpicking, because anything that disagrees with you tends to fall into that category.
|
Ha I must of have really made you salty if you're coming to the defense of a willfully ignorant liar, jumping on my one potential fallacy while ignoring his many.
Once again you're trying to derail discussion to be about how I don't word my post the way you'd like. We've had this discussion already, it's pointless and a waste of time, so I'm not going to engage further and you're just gonna have to deal with that.
|
Right, your other go to move. When you can't actually address the argument, simply assert the motivations of the opposing party in an attempt to discredit them.
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/1/Ad_Hominem_Abusive
