By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pokoko said:
The_Liquid_Laser said:
Frequent mergers and acquisitions are actually a sign of an industry in trouble. A healthy company can grow on its own merits, but a less healthy company can look like it is growing by merging with or acquiring another company. This is not a knock against Sony per se, as this sort of thing is happening all over the game industry. It is just to say the game industry has some important underlying issues which it needs to address or else it will be in big trouble in a generation or two.

A healthy company can grow via acquisition just fine.   Some of the most successful business moves in history have been acquisitions and some of the most successful businesses have a long history of buying smaller businesses.  Trying to paint this as some kind of automatic negative is simply doom mongering.  A bad move is a bad move and a good move is a good move.  

On topic, I think this was inevitable when Microsoft took the initiative.  Competition buying a multi-plat studio isn't just a gain for them, it's a loss for you.  Smart money would be on scanning the market for anyone teetering on the edge.  

Well why don't you give some examples of mergers and acquisitions that were successful, and then some examples of mergers and acquisitions that were unsuccessful?  Then point out what makes one work and another one fail.  

The way this post reads, you are just dismissing me, because you don't know what you are talking about.