d21lewis said:
It's supposed to show the transition from a clean beautiful era under the Republic to a gritty dirty era under the Empire. Maybe they failed but that was the point. |
The strange thing I see between original movies and the prequel is how the technology devolved a lot if you follow chronology of the movie, we know that it was just because better stuff were available for the prequels. But we can pretend it is a semi-apocalyptic time in the original trilogy even more for the rebels that had to scrape by to get stuff.
What doesn't make sense yet for the new trilogy is how after peace was made again, how they lost control of everything so fast (and they will probably make another trilogy to tell how they gone from 6 to 7).

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







