By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
d21lewis said:
Soundwave said:

Disney movies, regardless of plot decisions, at least feel like they're in the same universe as the OT -- gritty, lived in universe sci-fi with some fantasy. They feel tonally similar.

The prequels felt like a dumb ass cartoon specifically made for 8 year olds with a completely over the top tone. "Mooie Mooie meessa wessa" "Yousa no not likin' the Goooooooogans?!!!! MEEEEEESA like yousa!". "Ahhhhhhh yesssssssss, General Kenoooooobi ... I'm better than Count Dooooooooooookoooooooo". "Nooooooooooooooooooooo". "I hate sand it gets everywhere". 

Jeezus George.

Even the Clone Wars cartoon, which is an actual cartoon was not that cartoony.

It's supposed to show the transition from a clean beautiful era under the Republic to a gritty dirty era under the Empire. Maybe they failed but that was the point.

The strange thing I see between original movies and the prequel is how the technology devolved a lot if you follow chronology of the movie, we know that it was just because better stuff were available for the prequels. But we can pretend it is a semi-apocalyptic time in the original trilogy even more for the rebels that had to scrape by to get stuff.

What doesn't make sense yet for the new trilogy is how after peace was made again, how they lost control of everything so fast (and they will probably make another trilogy to tell how they gone from 6 to 7). 



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."