Baddman said:
but 33 hrs seems a lot tho. When I first got fallout 3 I thought it sucked but I had only played about 2 hours I moved onto Mass effect and loved it. Then I picked it up again years later when I had a drought and put over 200 hrs into it and I never even beat the game |
Yes it is, but I have done the same (30+h) and would probably have ended the game even not liking it if my save didn't corrupt.
Metallox said: There are plenty of things that make this game pretty immersive, the most important probably being its setting. You can feel that you're playing in a land devastated by the effects of war, plagues, monsters, and more; and it's always interesting to see how these affect the characters' behaviors. Geralt's detective-esque's dialogues are also intriguing to hear, they give a lot of insight about the world. On top of that, exploring grants you the chance to see very beatiful scenaries. The music has been awesome so far, as well. Overall, I'd see The Witcher 3 as a very appreciative game, which of course I see why it's not going to be of the liking of a lot of people, I didn't like BotW much as I wanted for the same reason. |
Well I don't remember ever filling the landed seemed destroyed by war, it seemed more like empty for no reason.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."