By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 on 20 October 2019
Edit Thread
Mr Puggsly said:
curl-6 said:

I still thought Witcher 2 looked impressive in spite of its issues, especially given the base game was built for PC hardware way more powerful than 360.

Same with Rage, it did have imperfections, but I thought it looked awesome overall at 60fps.

Resident Evil 5 did really wow me back in 2009, and I feel like it has aged very well because of its art style.

Witcher 2 looks okay, especially if you're playing on X1 BC which fixes the jarring textures issues.

Honestly, I wasn't that impressed by Witcher 2 on 360. Its a linear game and by the time it released there were plenty of large scale games on 360 that were more visually polished than that port. I just appreciated they did the port and I bought it at release, although I didn't much care for it.

At the time Rage released I didn't really appreciate 60 fps like I do now, so I didn't consider it looks less impressive than other games because of the frame rate. I remember at the time I bought into the hype of this game not reusing any textures, but the end product was a game with average (sometimes muddy) textures and texture pop in issues. In the end it was a game hyped for visuals that just seemed average to me.

If we're gonna praise games for 60 fps, I would argue CoD games deserve a mention. Pretty much everything from MW2 to Advanced Warfare.

MW2/MW3/BO/BO2 looked impressive, I concur, but not Advanced Warfare IMO, it suffered from looking noticeably downgraded as a result of being built for PS4/Xbone then chopped down, had a lot of rather poor textures and shadows.