Agente42 said:
Looks like you don't often play Nintendo Switch. I have a Nvidia Shield, a Psvita and a Nintendo Switch. The graphic difference is frightening, not to mention the screen better than both, not to mention offering two factory controls. The value of the Nintendo Switch is so readily apparent that it still has the same price as the generation leader, no problem. A more powerful console, yet people see value that the product delivers and don't find it expensive. |
"2 controls"
Being a generation ahead of PSVita it is expected that it have better graphics so not sure what you are trying to get from this.
Having the same price as the leade should mean something?
iPhones are much more expensive than several other smartphones that are better HW than itself, by your argument since it have a higher price than the most sold ones and also sells a lot then its price is right? Makes no sense.
You are paying more for the HW than something Sony or MS would make because those 2 companies take a hit on the price of the HW, paying more for the SW since the cartridge add on the pricetag plus Nintendo takes longer to discount games when they do. But I can't think it is overpriced? So you prefer to call PS4 or X1 underpriced or over delivering in value?

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







