Chrkeller said:
I have always loved comments like this. The Vita launched as the most powerful handheld (at that time) with a MSRP of $250. The Switch launched as the most powerful handheld at $300, and increased the screen size (in comparison to the Vita) by 24%, also increased screen resolution, offers dock, removable controllers.... Vita, priced well. Switch, overpriced. Lol. #sonylogic |
Must be the reason I paid 50 bucks for PSVita and 299 for Switch.
Considering Vita sold less than 20% of what PSP sold, most of the fanbase thought it was overpriced so I have no idea where you have that so many people think that PSVita was well priced.
Switch case make it worse on itself when you have NVidia shield and some knockoffs of similar power being cheaper than it. Plus Nintendo long story of hardly taking any loss on HW while Sony almost always take loss.
So sure we can discuss as much as we want if PSVita was worth 250 (If I thought it was I wouldn't have waited until like 5 years later to buy it in a pawn shop) but most likely it costed Sony about as much to make it.
Agente42 said:
apply double standards. Sony is the king |
See above before trying to be smart.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







